Asbestos in air samples

To determine the real concentration of asbestos for air monitoring and clearance certificates.
NIOSH 7402 : identification of PCM fibres (quantitative – TEM ratio (#asbestos fibres / #visible fibres) applicable subsequently to PCM counts in NOHSC:3003) – Direct Method

Identify PCM Fibres

According to the regulation, PCM is the standard method for air testing, and fibre concentration is calculated based on PCM observations. If the concentration exceeds the limit, TEM can help identify the fibres observed by PCM to determine if they are asbestos.

Example of thin fibres found on a clearance filter.

Beyond PCM limits : know the real exposure to asbestos

Fibres released from ACMs are released in different sizes. The size distribution of asbestos fibres varies in function of the ACM removed and the technique used to remove it. Many of these asbestos fibres are thinner than 0.2 μm and therefore are not observable using Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM).
By using TEM for your sample analysis you can avoid under-estimations in exposure and detect the thinnest fibrils of chrysotile from about 0.02 μm in width that may be present but undetected by PCM when analysing personal/environmental monitoring, and clearance filters, resulting in potential risk of exposure to workers and public.

PCM does not differentiate the nature of the objects counted moreover the direct preparation of filters can lead to an underestimation in counting when particles mask the fibres. In addition, chrysotile has the ability to generate fibrils up to 0.02 μm in diameter, which is ten times less than the separating power of an optical microscope. Finally, the chrysotile fibres are taken from a cellulose ester medium, a deep membrane, into which these winding fibres penetrate. Using PCM observation, the same fibre can therefore be found on several focal planes and poor focusing can lead to artificially splitting a long fibre, which will not be counted as such. Amphiboles are different because these asbestos fibres are more rectilinear and have a lower capacity to generate fibrils as thin as those of chrysotile. 

The PCM does not differentiate and counts any object that meets the morphological fibre criteria. Thus, in the case of worksites focused on removing asbestos spray coatings, amosite (amphibole) is present together with artificial mineral fibres, which are taken into account by PCM but not by TEM. In the case of land containing asbestos, PCM overestimates compared to TEM. Conversely, for asbestos-containing plasters, paints and coatings, the PCM considerably underestimates the number of fibres. Direct comparison between the PCM and TEM methods confirmed that PCM underestimates the dust levels, in the majority of cases, when compared to TEM, with this observation being reinforced as dust levels rose. This underestimation of exposure could result in insufficient prevention means being implemented, particularly with regards to collective protection, such as depressurising work areas and increasing the number of air changes in the area, as well as the choice of respiratory protection.

For more informations

Request a quote, ask a specific question, or ask for the TEM sample submission form